By Lenny Ben-David (copied from his blog)
The parents of Rachel Corrie deserve Israel’s
condolences and sympathy for the loss of their daughter on March
16, 2003. But, like their daughter, they misdirected their anger and
crusade for justice against Israel.
So who is to blame? Rachel Corrie herself, for
her presence and carelessness on a volatile battlefield? Maybe, and
maybe not. There may be other culprits lurking.
I’m troubled by several elements of the Corrie case:
- We’re all shocked by the horrifying pictures of Corrie lying on the
ground, broken and bleeding. But has anyone ever asked what kind of
ghoul would snap pictures rather than rush to her aid or run to get
- Numerous pictures of Corrie standing defiantly in front of an
Israeli bulldozer appeared in the media, but upon investigation it
transpired that not a single one was from the incident that killed her.
Some were taken hours before the fatal incident with a different
bulldozer; others were sloppy photoshopped forgeries. Why were there
photos after she was injured and not before?
- Corrie was not the only member of the International Solidarity
Movement (ISM) who was nearly crushed beneath the bulldozer’s maw that
day. Indeed, at least two – “Will and Jenny” – were pulled away by their
colleagues at the last second.
- Immediately after Corrie’s death, several leaders of ISM were
interviewed. They didn’t express horror or even sorrow. They spoke of
peace soldiers’ sacrifices in battle and the PR benefits of an American
woman dying at hands of Israel’s army.
The ghoulish photographer was an ISM member
who went by the name of “Joe Smith.” His real name: Joseph Carr, a
self-proclaimed anarchist who apparently used aliases to travel in and
out of Israel and anti-American hotspots like Fallujah, Iraq. His March
17 affidavit immediately after Corrie’s death suggests a narcissist who
speaks more about his trauma than Corrie’s death, and an agitprop
specialist who had all of the press contacts and numbers readily at hand
to launch a press campaign just 30 minutes after her death. Here is an
excerpt, as the affidavit appeared on Electronic Intifada
I was doing interviews non-stop
starting 30 min. after her death, all the way until midnight, and then
starting again at 6am and continuing all day today. I literally would
never hang up the phone, just switch to an incoming call on call
waiting. When I did finally get a second to breathe, I’d have like 30
Anyway, it was a bit therapeutic I think,
telling the story over and over, and interviews make me feel [as if I
was doing something] important [in the aftermath]. All this thing is a
media event now, so we must continue a campaign as hard as possible
before the new and bigger tragedy, the Iraq war, begins. The few hours I
had off last night between midnight and 4am, was spent organizing
today’s events, press conferences, live TV/radio interviews, a
demonstration and the beginnings of the traditional Palestinian 3-day
(By the way, I took the pictures you may have
seen of her, standing with the megaphone in front of the bulldozer, and
the ones of her friends helping her.)
Was Corrie some cast member for an ISM
production directed by Joe Smith/Carr (who incidentally also showed up
several weeks later at the scene of the shooting death of another ISM
pawn in Gaza)?
Rachel Corrie is portrayed as a brave fighter
who defiantly stood in front of the Israeli destruction machine, and
some of her colleagues testified to that fact subsequently. But the
first accounts and affidavits after the accidental death state that
Corrie was sitting or kneeling on the ground, not standing. Of course it
was difficult for the tractor driver to see her; her profile was very
low among the rubble, and the view from the armored tractor was limited.
“When the bulldozer approached a house today,” wrote The New York Times
its report of the accident, “Ms. Corrie, who was wearing a bright
orange jacket, dropped to her knees.” Dale stated then that she was
kneeling and “began to rise.”
“The bulldozer drove toward Rachel slowly,
gathering earth in its scoop as it went,” an ISM friend of Corrie’s
stated in 2003. “She knelt there, she did not move.”
Another colleague related: “She did not ‘trip
and fall’ in front of the bulldozer. She sat down in front of it, well
in advance.“ He added: “Corrie dropped her bullhorn and sat down in
front of one of the bulldozers.”
Corrie apparently couldn’t even be seen by
Carr/Smith, the photographer who couldn’t — or wouldn’t — take her
picture sitting on the ground in the bulldozer’s path.
Corrie’s colleagues gave affidavits and
told Newsweek’s Joshua Hammer in a 2003 Mother Jones article that two of
them, Jennie and Will, also found themselves under the 50-ton behemoth
and were pulled out at the last second. These bulldozers crawled at a
snail’s pace of one to five kilometers per hour, certainly enough time
for someone to avoid the machine if they wanted to.
“For two hours we attempted at great risk to ourselves to obstruct and frustrate the bulldozers in their work,” said one.
“Our group began to stand in front of these
bulldozers in an attempt to stop them,” said another. “Several times we
had to dive away at the last moment in order to avoid being crushed.
This continued for about two and a half hours.… At one point, Will from
the United States was nearly crushed.”
Why would the “internationals” risk their
lives in such a way? And was Corrie a partner to this treacherous game?
Reporter Joshua Hammer explained that on that fateful day the ISM
members decided to take their confrontation with the IDF up a notch.
They needed to prove themselves to the local population:
An anonymous letter was
circulating which referred to Corrie and the other expatriate women in
Rafah as “nasty foreign bitches” whom “our Palestinian young men are
That morning [of Corrie’s death], the ISM team
tried to devise a strategy to counteract the letter’s effects. “We all
had a feeling that our role was too passive,” said one ISM member. “We
talked about how to engage the Israeli military.” That morning, team
members made a number of proposals that seemed designed only to
aggravate the problem. …“The idea was to more directly challenge the
Israeli military dominance using our international status,” said the
One of the ISM founders, Thom Saffold, admitted to The Washington Post
the day after Corrie’s death that “it’s possible they [the protesters] were not as disciplined as we would have liked.”
Saffold continued with astounding callousness:
“But we’re like a peace army. Generals send young men and women off to
operations, and some die.”
That wasn’t the only statement indicating that
Corrie was cannon fodder for the ISM. Another of ISM’s founders, George
Rishmawi, told The San Francisco Chronicle
When Palestinians get shot by
Israeli soldiers, no one is interested anymore. But if some of these
foreign volunteers get shot or even killed, then the international media
will sit up and take notice.
Another ISMer in Gaza committed to writing similar sentiments in a letter home in February 2003:
You just can’t imagine it unless
you see it, and even then you are always well aware that your experience
is not at all the reality: what with the difficulties the Israeli Army would face if they shot an unarmed US citizen.” (emphasis added)
The author was Rachel Corrie, one month before
she died. Did she believe that she should be that unarmed US citizen?
Did the Gaza ISM cadre believe that they had to prove to the Palestinian
locals that they were as committed to the cause as the Palestinian shihads
themselves up on Israeli buses? In April, one month after her death,
the ISM office in Gaza was visited by two British Muslims who went on to
lay flowers at the site where Corrie died. Five days later they blew themselves up in a Tel Aviv bar
, killing three and wounding dozens.
Did Corrie and her ISM colleagues decide to
play Russian roulette with the bulldozer on that fateful day? Did she
fail to escape death, while the others pulled away in time? Was Joseph
Carr/Smith there to produce another blame-Israel production as powerful
as the 2000 video of the shooting of Gaza boy Mohammed Dura – ostensibly
by Israeli soldiers?
The Hollywood film “The Life of David Gale”
tells the tale of fanatic anti-capital punishment advocate who commits
suicide. But first she stages a crime scene to make her final act looks
like murder, so that an innocent man is executed as her killer. After
her death, a video is discovered and the terrible injustice of capital
punishment is revealed. Her crusade against the death penalty finally
receives national attention.
The movie came out in February 2003. Corrie died one month later.
So was it murder or suicide? And at whose hand?
The opinions and facts here are presented solely by the author,
and The Times of Israel assumes no responsibility for them. In case of
abuse, click here to report this post